Haha, wow, my old blog! Just how I remember it. Let me dust off the post button reeeal quick. Yup, still works.
Okay, so I've been thinking lately about the Internet, and because I consider myself a big picture person (I like to consider systems as a whole), I've been thinking about the big picture of the Internet. And, ladies and gentlemen, it's a mess.
The Internet is a mess. Virtually every aspect of the Internet is poorly understood and, therefore, poorly managed - the way we access it , regulate it, pay for it, view it, make money on it, control identity with it, communicate through it. Maybe I'm being melodramatic, but can you predict the outcome of any one of these problems we're facing right now? I know I can't. But sure, we're starting to figure out what works and what doesn't.
So what? Well, so a lot of things. For example, as an individual, using the Internet means walking in a reputation minefield. You know that scene in Grease where the news of Rizzo's unexpected pregnancy beats her back from the bathroom? Well, it's like that, except worse. My generation often treats the Internet like its own private social forum, but in reality the information is transparent and easy to share. Organizations have as much (if not more) to worry about than individuals; "isolated incidents" that once flew under the radar of big media can now blow up faster than alka-seltzer in a seagull.
And if you're not messing up your reputation online, your organization is probably, at best, basking in the mediocrity of its lifeless Web page. Which is fine. But it's no way to drive traffic, command attention or make money.
How can you use the Internet to its full potential?
1. Consider your goals as an organization. Could an organzational Web site or involvement in social media help you achieve those goals?
2. Consider your audience. What are they like?
3. Consider the value of your content. If you're a corporation, people aren't going to visit your page to view your canned advertorial content. There'd better be something to worthwhile to your readers - attention is difficult to keep.
4. Update! Content must timely or no one will care.
Later I'll talk more about how you can engage the online audience. In the meantime, to my readers (if there are any of you) - how has the Internet affected the way you consume media?
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Two minutes of pure cute
I'm sorry, but viral marketing just doesn't get much better than this:
He he he.
He he he.
Friday, February 20, 2009
Things that rhyme with turtle: curdle, fertile, girdle...
Wordle!
What a neat toy. This site generates word clouds from any massive block of text you feed it. Below is a word cloud built from the content of my blog:
Way cool.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Making YouTube work for you
This is exactly the kind of video media people need to post to YouTube:
In a little under three minutes, these two WGN anchors showed their unique personalities. They've thoroughly choreographed this handshake during years of commercial breaks. The video is quirky enough to make you laugh - but shows subtle dedication and professionalism.
At the end of the day, what can one local news station offer that other stations can't? All local news stations offers news, but many watch one station in particular for the people they recognize. Make your anchors likable and you'll keep all eyes on you.
YouTube is a way to make yourself stand out. Don't be surprised if this video goes viral.
In a little under three minutes, these two WGN anchors showed their unique personalities. They've thoroughly choreographed this handshake during years of commercial breaks. The video is quirky enough to make you laugh - but shows subtle dedication and professionalism.
At the end of the day, what can one local news station offer that other stations can't? All local news stations offers news, but many watch one station in particular for the people they recognize. Make your anchors likable and you'll keep all eyes on you.
YouTube is a way to make yourself stand out. Don't be surprised if this video goes viral.
Saturday, January 17, 2009
Sometimes, "sorry" is the best medicine
If you've ever fought with a friend, you know how hard it is to make amends without one of you saying "I'm sorry."
Why should crisis communications be any different? Occasionally bad blood fizzles out, but companies in crisis usually have to be vindicated by the news media or make some sort of apology or announcement of regret before they can rebuild relationships with consumers.
When Fox had Hulu take down 3 seasons of the hit show "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia," Hulu experienced some immediate backlash. Perhaps the negative response wouldn't have been so strong if it weren't for the popularity of the show.
But was the removal of the show really even Hulu's fault? Fox owns the rights to "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia," and rights ownership issues are dangerous territory - Hulu had no choice but to anger consumers.
But Hulu consumers weren't just angry that the content was removed - they were angry that it was removed with no notice. Recognizing the PR crisis at hand, Hulu CEO Jason Kilar issued a heartfelt apology and returned the shows to the site with permission from FX, giving users an additional two weeks before removing the episodes.
On the social news Web site Reddit, responses to Kilar's statement are varied and interesting. Most believe this is exactly how a company should behave in a crisis situation:
"If every company out there had this level of respect for their customers, there would be FAR FEWER incidents of deleting users' data.
Companies should regularly be grovelling at the feet of their customers. They exist solely thanks to the willing contributions of the customers, and without the customers, they are nothing.
And it's only recently that companies have really forgotten that."
-innocentbystander
While some users are baffled by the apology's intensity:
"This is a wildly excessive apology for such an event. It's not as if they deleted users' data or cancelled their vacations."
-acontorer
But the vast majority of Redditors agreed that the apology was appropriate, which shows how far an apology can go in winning back the trust of the public. As Kilar himself said, "Customer trust is hard won, easily lost."
Why should crisis communications be any different? Occasionally bad blood fizzles out, but companies in crisis usually have to be vindicated by the news media or make some sort of apology or announcement of regret before they can rebuild relationships with consumers.
When Fox had Hulu take down 3 seasons of the hit show "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia," Hulu experienced some immediate backlash. Perhaps the negative response wouldn't have been so strong if it weren't for the popularity of the show.
But was the removal of the show really even Hulu's fault? Fox owns the rights to "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia," and rights ownership issues are dangerous territory - Hulu had no choice but to anger consumers.
But Hulu consumers weren't just angry that the content was removed - they were angry that it was removed with no notice. Recognizing the PR crisis at hand, Hulu CEO Jason Kilar issued a heartfelt apology and returned the shows to the site with permission from FX, giving users an additional two weeks before removing the episodes.
On the social news Web site Reddit, responses to Kilar's statement are varied and interesting. Most believe this is exactly how a company should behave in a crisis situation:
"If every company out there had this level of respect for their customers, there would be FAR FEWER incidents of deleting users' data.
Companies should regularly be grovelling at the feet of their customers. They exist solely thanks to the willing contributions of the customers, and without the customers, they are nothing.
And it's only recently that companies have really forgotten that."
-innocentbystander
While some users are baffled by the apology's intensity:
"This is a wildly excessive apology for such an event. It's not as if they deleted users' data or cancelled their vacations."
-acontorer
But the vast majority of Redditors agreed that the apology was appropriate, which shows how far an apology can go in winning back the trust of the public. As Kilar himself said, "Customer trust is hard won, easily lost."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
